18 Comments
User's avatar
Jane's avatar

Wouldn’t it be nice if they didn’t cover him at all? I’d love to go just ONE day without hearing his annoying voice or seeing his repulsive face.

Expand full comment
Stanley L's avatar

What if the entire press boycotted the Whitehouse entirely.

Expand full comment
Annie Riley's avatar

Wouldn’t it be nice if no press covered him as long as he was doing this?

Expand full comment
Donna Luehrman's avatar

It was actually AP not Reuters who was banned over the Gulf of Mexico rename stupidity. I refuse to say or write the other Trump endorsed name for the Gulf at this point.

Expand full comment
Wendy Shelley's avatar

Love to have you here, Miles! What about if all the MSM reporters and journalists self-censor . It would mean NOT covering First Felon for however, long. What a joy it would be to read a newspaper or turn on a TV channel without his ugly face, nausea-inducing voice and demeanor, and no more broadcasting his vengeful lying on Truth Social. Oh boy! 😊

Expand full comment
The Red Lipstick Forum's avatar

Horrifying. Brazen. Cruel. Unjust. Tactics that are reserved for the most corrupt fascists. Deny, Lie, Blame, Shame, beat people down all under the guise of Presidential power, supported by the DOJ and Supreme Court.

Expand full comment
Laura’s Pissed!'s avatar

Does he really believe that will make people forget about it?! Oh-no it definitely won’t!

Expand full comment
William Lowry's avatar

You're absolutely right Mr. Taylor and thank technology for the access to many opinions, some good, some bad, and some controlled - which is the theme, of course, of the Trump administration. I always tell folks that considering the "Chief" and his minions as the Keystone Kops is a way to both ease the tension and gain time for a just perspective, BUT, the problem is that it has to be individually assumed. PS Look see Tom Nichol's essay in todays "Atlantic"!

Expand full comment
Jane B's avatar

True. Illegal.wrong. destructive: "The Acosta episode was the prototype. What’s happening now is the systemization."

Expand full comment
Star Aasved's avatar

Frankly, it's my opinion that wall-to-wall coverage of trump should end. Many of his actions and statements are purely to keep him in the news, and - at the same tie - so much of it is ridiculous that it's unimportant.

Expand full comment
Linda's avatar

He is so predictable......

F rump!

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

Keep calling it out and publicly sharing!

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

There needs to come a day when no press show up in the White House briefing room or in the Oval Office for those ridiculous press conferences when he has a foreign leader present. They just need to all be gone and to let him wonder where did they all go? I live for that day.

Expand full comment
Jane R. M. Harrison's avatar

When will we stop this revenge? It is sickening and wrong! The world feels like it has turned upside down. and the evil bullies have cowed us all. I pray the truth tellers stand strong.

Expand full comment
Laura Bland's avatar

Miles, while it is disgusting that we have a president who is so fragile and delicate, one has to wonder if the traditional "press corps gets on the plane and presents lunatic ravings as if they are news items, when in fact they are just lunatic ravings along the lines of Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now" is beyond its usefulness. At this point, every statement made by the president or his flacks are inherently lies, falsehoods, confabulations and/or obfuscations, so WTF difference does it make? Solid journalists will get the stories regardless.

Expand full comment
Patr's avatar

Get the butterfly net. Issue one to every non conservative reporter. It’s the new Gong Show!

Expand full comment